Johnny Depps Lawyers don’t seem to be scrapping a legal strategy that could imply on his ex-wife Amber Hard He will not have to pay the $ 8 million verdict in the conclusion of his defamation suit against him. The jury found Depp a winner but Hard, through his lawyer, indicated that he did not have the money to make the huge settlement. A divorce lawyer has reached out to us with some insights into why Depp’s legal team could give Hard’s team a chance to waive the payment, unless they make a big discount.
Johnny Depp, Amber Hard Possible New Legal Strategy in Defamation Case?
Amber Hard has been ordered to pay প্র 8 million to her ex-husband Johnny Depp following a jury verdict. Caribbean pirates In favor of the actor in the defamation suit against him. Hard’s lawyer at the end of the hearing Aquaman The actress is unable to pay the multi-million dollar amount, which could be an interesting legal solution for Depp’s legal team.
Related: Amber Hard argues that her defamatory article about Johnny Depp was ‘public interest’
During a recent interview Good morning America George Stefanopoulos, Depp’s lawyer, questioned the outcome of the case as well as what the team’s next steps might be. Stefanopoulos began, “Hard’s lawyer says he plans to appeal the verdict, he has no money to pay for the verdict, and you all say the goal is not to make Miss Hard poor.”
‘GMA’ interview with Depp’s lawyers
The GMA Anchor continued, “Is it possible that we will see a settlement where he will reject the appeal to Mr. Depp for any financial loss?”
Camille Vasquez and Ben Chew, Depp’s lawyers, were apparently reluctant to share specific details about the ongoing legal discussions. “Okay George, we can’t explicitly disclose the attorney-client contact,” Chew replied, “but as Mr. Depp testified and we both made it clear in our respective conclusions, it was never about money for Mr. Depp. It was about restoring his reputation and he did it. ”
Stefanopoulos, pushing for more information, asked, “So you’re not revealing any benefits, but it seems like it’s something that might be on the table, but it depends on Mrs. Hard?” To which Chew reiterated, “Again, we have to be careful what we say, but it was about Mr. Depp’s reputation. That was for him. “
See an excerpt from the interview below
Since there is still a debate going on behind the scenes that Depp’s legal team cannot speak at the moment, it is clear that what Stefanopoulos suggested could not necessarily lead to the case. However, there are many reasons for this. For Depp’s lawyers to consider it seriously as an alternative, a legal professional has demanded.
Related: How Amber Hard’s Devil Shows Social Media Toxicity to Women in the Johnny Depp Trial
Legal experts have weights
Rifford Palmer, a Chicago family lawyer, is the author of the book I just want this don, Commented on the potential benefits of the 8 million no-damages proposal unless you appeal the hard case. According to Palmer, the strategy “uses a cost-benefit analysis.”
“For Depp, the offer allows him to look great in a moment when he has the upper hand, which furthers his goal of restoring his universal image,” Palmer continued. As Depp and his lawyers insist, the lawsuit was “never about money” and always about the loss of his reputation.
Although Palmer stressed that an appeal from Hard was “unlikely” to succeed, he noted that avoiding the process “would also relieve him of the risk that the appeal could undo his victory.” In conclusion, Palmer said, “Being charitable is not just a beautiful thing. It is also an effective strategy. We will continue to monitor this case as new developments occur.